Free help with homework

Why join Brainly?

  • ask questions about your assignment
  • get answers with explanations
  • find similar questions



Forests have played a vital role in the socioeconomic and cultural life of the tribal people of India. It is well-known that majority of the tribal population lived in isolation in the forested regions of India with harmony, security and trust for many centuries and developed a symbiotic relationship with the forest.

The forest environment satisfies the deep-rooted tribal traditions and sentiments throughout their life until death. Even after death, the deceased tribal is laid to rest in a grave close to a forested region by most of the hunting and gathering tribes of India. Thus, even after death, the tribals are close to the forest.

The forests provide the tribals and other communities living close to the forest habitat, shelter, raw materials for household equipment; other objects of material culture like resins, gums and dyes etc., wood for building houses, fencing and tool making etc., Firewood, herbal medicines; fodder for cattle and grazing areas; other material cultural objects like ornaments and religious items etc. These are some of the direct benefits the tribals and indigenous communities get from the forest.

In India, the life and economy of the tribal people are intimately connected with the forests. Majority of the tribal population in India actually lives inside the forests and make a living out of the forest produce collected by them; mainly edible roots and tubers and by hunting small animals.

These primitive hunting and gathering tribal communities who are numerically very small live mostly in Orissa, Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. The survival of these primitive tribals is dependent on minor forest produce like mahua flowers, sal seeds, sal and Tendu leaves, edible roots, tubers, bamboo and wild fruits etc.

Tribals in Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Jharkhand indicate that over 80 per cent of the forest-dwellers collect 25-50 per cent of their food from the forests.

Thus for the hunting and gathering tribal communities like Birhor, Korwa, Pahariya, Asur, Birjia, Chenchu, Kadar, Paliyan etc., minor forest produce is the major support for their survival. While the tribals who are settled agriculturists like Santhal, Munda, Oraon, Ho, Bhil, Gond, Baiga and others, who are considered as major tribes of Central India tribal belt are economically much better off than the minor tribes living close to or inside the forested regions in central and eastern India.

In a way, this was an extension of the policy during the British rule, which lay down that the claims of the communities living near forests should not override national interests. The tribals living near forests were discouraged from using forests and forest produce.

For the eight per cent population of India represented by the tribals, the forest is the main source of livelihood and the concept of "social forestry" developed by the National Commission on Agriculture (1976) cannot meet the needs of the tribals or the poor rural population for the fuel, fodder and other minor forest produce.

It is to be noted that the tribal economy is basically subsistence economy. Traditionally they produce only for themselves and for their immediate community. It is a general feeling of the Forest Department that the tribal people destroy the forest through their harmful practices like shifting cultivation and reckless felling of trees for firewood etc.

The most significant aspect of the National Forest Policy of 1988 is that it calls for the involvement of the forest-dwellers, tribals and the neighbouring communities of the forest in the management of the forests.

As the tribals of different regions have different socio-economic and cultural characteristics, the nature of involvement and extent of participation of the tribals in the forest management will be different under different situations. Joint forest management involving the tribals may be very successful in one area but may not be so in another area, as this depends upon the capacity of understanding and adopting this innovation of the government by the tribals.

0 0 0
The Brain
  • The Brain
  • Helper
Not sure about the answer?
Learn more with Brainly!
Having trouble with your homework?
Get free help!
  • 80% of questions are answered in under 10 minutes
  • Answers come with explanations, so that you can learn
  • Answer quality is ensured by our experts