I don't agree that Mohammed of Ghori is more influential than Akbar because Akbar invaded India and brought forward many reforms which were beneficial to the people whereas Mohammed of Ghori just invaded India, collected loot and returned.
There is nothing to compare between both of them. because everyone knows that akbar had reformed our his empire time all people were happy.he was a muslim emperor and then also he respected other religions.he had a dream of  india together with joy , happiness and brotherhood. on the other hand ghori only looted india. you may take help from 8th hindi textbook 'bharat ki khoj'